Giving moviegoers the most accurate picture of movie reviews possible
Home
Out on DVD
Search Movies
Compare Movies
Critics
Publications
About Us
Dear Reader: Update, Movie Review Intelligence will discontinue
publishing this website at the end of May (more...)
Search a Movie:
THIS MEANS WAR Movie Reviews
Comedy about two CIA operatives who are best friends until they fall for the same woman and begin using their high-tech skills against one another to win her over. Cast: Chris Pine, Tom Hardy, Reese Witherspoon, Chelsea Handler, Til Schweiger, Abigail Spencer Director: McG Release Date: February 17, 2012 DVD Release: May 22, 2012 From: 20th Century Fox Rating: PG-13 Length: 2 hr. 0 min.
Out On DVD
MAY 22, 2012

This Means War, Weak Reviews, Mixed

Updated: Fri, Sep 7 2012, 03:34pm
Digg This StumbleUpon del.icio.us Twitter Share on Facebook
 | E-Mail to a Friend  | Print 
This Means War

This Means War played to weak reviews. Reviews were mixed. • Mary Pols wrote in Time, "...smarmy... What is the compulsively watchable star of 'Freeway,' 'Election,' 'Legally Blonde' and 'Walk the Line' doing in immature garbage like this?" • And Tom Long wrote in the Detroit News, "There's nothing serious going on here, folks. Don't bother to think too much about it. But if you want some nice light yuks..."   More Reviews Below...

This Means War
Positive Reviews
(46 Reviews, reviews below)
 Compare This Movie... 
TotalBroad
National
Press
Local
News-
papers
Alter–
native/
Indie
High-
Brow
Press
Movie
Industry
NY/LA
Chicago
Toronto
Key
Cities
Total
B.O.
39.7% 44.7% 35.2% 31.2% 28.1% 33.4% 33.7% 39.7% $54.8M
Averages: 51.7% 54.3% 51.9% 47.1% 45.9% 49.0% 49.7% 54.4%
* 39.7% positive reviews out of 100%

Reviews & Quotes (46)


BROAD NATIONAL PRESS (10 Reviews)

Alynda Wheat, People: MODERATE (cg)
"What FDR and Tuck end up doing to each other is legitimately hilarious... But what they do to Lauren is so unfathomably, unpardonably creepy, it should be prosecuted." (See all of Alynda Wheat's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
180 words, 02/09/12

Mary Pols, Time: POOR
"...smarmy... What is the compulsively watchable star of 'Freeway,' 'Election,' 'Legally Blonde' and 'Walk the Line' doing in immature garbage like this?" (See all of Mary Pols's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
806 words, 02/17/12

Christy Lemire, Associated Press: GOOD (NOT GREAT) (cg)
"...more tolerable than it ought to be.... you've got your sport utility vehicles tumbling in slow motion, your gravity-defying shootouts and your obligatory explosions galore." (See all of Christy Lemire's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
543 words, 02/16/12

Mara Reinstein, Us Weekly: VERY GOOD (cg)
"Shameless fun!... finds its groove as the buddies use their intelligence to sabotage each other's dates.... The alluring, trim Witherspoon has never looked better." (See all of Mara Reinstein's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
127 words, 02/16/12

Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly: VERY GOOD (cg)
"...may have been hammered together by brute Hollywood force, but there's this going for it: It's game to throw in anything that'll keep the motor running." (See all of Lisa Schwarzbaum's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
511 words, 02/17/12

Peter Travers, Rolling Stone: WEAK (cg)
"...death-sentenced by a lack of humor, heart and a coherent reason for being. I could say more, but do I really need to?" (See all of Peter Travers's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
53 words, 02/17/12

Claudia Puig, USA Today: MODERATE (cg)
"...made sporadically enjoyable by the affable chemistry of Pine and Hardy." (See all of Claudia Puig's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
297 words, 02/17/12

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: WEAK (cg)
"If there's anything I hate more than a stupid action comedy, it's an incompetent stupid action comedy. It's not so bad it's good. It's so bad it's nothing else but bad." (See all of Roger Ebert's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
591 words, 02/17/12

Kat Murphy, MSN Movies: POOR (cg)
"...a droopy love triangle seriously short on sexual chemistry, not to mention the kind of playful self-awareness that can spice up even the blandest romantic comedy." (See all of Kat Murphy's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
779 words, 02/15/12

James Berardinelli, Reel Views: GOOD (NOT GREAT) (cg)
"...all splash and little heart. A lot of romantic comedies fail because they're too saccharine. 'This Means War' could have used a little more of that." (See all of James Berardinelli's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
958 words, 02/15/12
we have an app for when you're out and about
get our iPhone app...     or get our mobile web app...
movie     review     intelligence

NEW YORK/LOS ANGELES/CHICAGO/TORONTO (12 Reviews)

Manohla Dargis, New York Times: WEAK
"...strained, largely mirthless... would be perfectly acceptable watched on the back of an airline seat or at home while you're doing housework." (See all of Manohla Dargis's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
613 words, 02/17/12

Elizabeth Weitzman, New York Daily News: POOR (cg)
"...depressingly mean-spirited.... Witherspoon is constantly forced to act like an insecure teen.... the whole thing is slick and handsome and rotten at the core." (See all of Elizabeth Weitzman's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
299 words, 02/14/12

Betsy Sharkey, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...a hit-and-miss affair... if you are in the mood for action, there is a whole lot of it here.... this is war after all, a bromance, not a romance, muscle, not mush." (See all of Betsy Sharkey's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
695 words, 02/17/12

Lou Lumenick, New York Post: POOR (cg)
"Nearly totally laugh-, chemistry- and coherence-free... has a script whose sensible parts would fit on a napkin with enough room left over for the Gettysburg Address." (See all of Lou Lumenick's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
555 words, 02/17/12

Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune: POOR (cg)
"...pure, witless discombobulation.... note to Witherspoon: this is the sort of consumer product you're supposed to test before you win an Academy Award, not after." (See all of Michael Phillips's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
544 words, 02/17/12

David Edelstein, New York Magazine: WEAK
"...gut-whomping... not a distinguished addition to director McG's oeuvre." (See all of David Edelstein's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
102 words, 02/13/12

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: WEAK (cg)
"If there's anything I hate more than a stupid action comedy, it's an incompetent stupid action comedy. It's not so bad it's good. It's so bad it's nothing else but bad."
(See all of Roger Ebert's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
591 words, 02/17/12

Nick Pinkerton, Village Voice/LA Weekly: WEAK
"...acts straightaway like it has an audience eating out of its hand, while neglecting to do anything surprising or delightful to actually seduce that audience." (See all of Nick Pinkerton's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
664 words, 02/15/12

Linda Barnard, Toronto Star: MODERATE (cg)
"...this is late-night talk-show host and comic Chelsea Handler's flick as she steals every scene she's in, contributing the only real laughs to this rote popcorn muncher." (See all of Linda Barnard's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
540 words, 02/17/12

Liam Lacey, Toronto Globe & Mail: MODERATE (cg)
"It's a bad sign when a film which aims only for froth can't achieve more than moments of embarrassment, punctuated with sporadic agitation." (See all of Liam Lacey's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
579 words, 02/17/12

Norman Wilner, Toronto Now: POOR (cg)
"The script is nonsensical even for an outsized action movie, with a nasty streak that finds characters actively endangering each other for cheap laughs." (See all of Norman Wilner's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
227 words, 02/16/12

KEY CITIES (12 Reviews)

Ann Hornaday, Washington Post: WEAK (cg)
"...sloppy, scattered, utterly synthetic... it becomes increasingly clear that the romantic tension at play exists mostly between the men in question." (See all of Ann Hornaday's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
590 words, 02/17/12

Carrie Rickey, Philadelphia Inquirer: GOOD (NOT GREAT) (cg)
"McG, auteur of the 'Charlie's Angels' films, is not blessed with finesse.... aims low but provides the basic movie pleasure of seeing good-looking people looking good." (See all of Carrie Rickey's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
469 words, 02/17/12

Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star-Tribune: POOR (cg)
"...the worst McG film yet... brings his pummeling touch to one of the most unnecessary, audience-abusing, incoherent, stupefyingly dumb movies of our young century." (See all of Colin Covert's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
468 words, 02/17/12

Bill Goodykoontz, Arizona Republic: MODERATE (cg)
"...it's OK, but you would think that with Reese Witherspoon, Chris Pine and Tom Hardy on board for a romantic comedy, some sparks would fly. They don't..." (See all of Bill Goodykoontz's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
566 words, 02/17/12

Wesley Morris, Boston Globe: POOR (cg)
"...a romantic comedy whose DNA consists of other movies, television action shows, sitcoms, and comic strips." (See all of Wesley Morris's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
855 words, 02/17/12

Stephen Whitty, New Jersey Star-Ledger: WEAK (cg)
"...this isn't a romantic comedy. This is two dopey kids tussling at the family dinner table, with Reese Witherspoon as the wishbone they're fighting over." (See all of Stephen Whitty's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
506 words, 02/14/12

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: POOR (cg)
"Witherspoon, Pine and Hardy aren't playing people, or even exaggerations of people, but subhumans, smiling veneers with physical needs... but no souls." (See all of Mick LaSalle's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
514 words, 02/17/12

Moira Macdonald, Seattle Times: MODERATE (cg)
"...gets by, just barely, on the strength of a likable cast..." (See all of Moira Macdonald's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
379 words, 02/17/12

Joe Williams, St. Louis Post-Dispatch: MODERATE (cg)
"...a toxic triangle where the only satisfying outcome would be mutual annihilation.... Even by the standards of light entertainment, 'This Means War' is meaningless." (See all of Joe Williams's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
304 words, 02/17/12

Steve Persall, Tampa Bay Times: GOOD (NOT GREAT) (cg)
"...has Reese Witherspoon continuing her strange quest to be Meg Ryan, fluttery and easily led by the heart.... Everyone tries hard. Too hard." (See all of Steve Persall's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
534 words, 02/16/12

Tom Long, Detroit News: VERY GOOD (cg)
"There's nothing serious going on here, folks. Don't bother to think too much about it. But if you want some nice light yuks, 'This Means War' should do the trick." (See all of Tom Long's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
573 words, 02/17/12

Rene Rodriguez, Miami Herald: POOR (cg)
"...so preposterous, it's insulting." (See all of Rene Rodriguez's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
754 words, 02/17/12

ALTERNATIVE/INDIE PRESS (11 Reviews)

Nick Pinkerton, Village Voice/LA Weekly: WEAK
"...acts straightaway like it has an audience eating out of its hand, while neglecting to do anything surprising or delightful to actually seduce that audience." (See all of Nick Pinkerton's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
664 words, 02/15/12

Sean O'Connell, Cinema Blend: WEAK (cg)
"...can't decide if it's an action-thriller with a little romance mixed in, or a formulaic rom-com with one or two memorable action set pieces.... it whiffs completely on both..." (See all of Sean O'Connell's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
658 words, 02/14/12

Brett Michel, Boston Phoenix: POOR (cg)
"...quickly devolves into 'Spy vs. Spy' territory, only with incompetently staged and edited action and little of that ol' Mad magazine zing." (See all of Brett Michel's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
151 words, 02/16/12

Scott Tobias, AV Club: POOR (cg)
"McG tries to turn this into a cool pop confection along the lines of his 'Charlie's Angels' movies. But pouring on the douchey hipness and charm only makes things worse." (See all of Scott Tobias's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
404 words, 02/16/12

Cynthia Fuchs, Pop Matters: POOR (cg)
"...directed by McG with his signature indelicacy..." (See all of Cynthia Fuchs's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
782 words, 02/17/12

Alison Willmore, Movieline: WEAK (cg)
"...lay back and bask in the movie-star wattage of the cast, which is considerable and unexpected, and try not to pay attention to anything they're actually doing or saying." (See all of Alison Willmore's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
907 words, 02/16/12

R. Kurt Osenlund, Slant: MODERATE (cg)
"...it's safe to assume the punchy product is a few generations removed from Simon Kinberg and Timothy Dowling's original script..." (See all of R. Kurt Osenlund's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
816 words, 02/14/12

Norman Wilner, Toronto Now: POOR (cg)
"The script is nonsensical even for an outsized action movie, with a nasty streak that finds characters actively endangering each other for cheap laughs."
(See all of Norman Wilner's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
227 words, 02/16/12

Curt Holman, Atlanta Creative Loafing: WEAK (cg)
"Reese Witherspoon and Tom Hardy are better than the material and Chris Pine proves blandly handsome in a Ben Affleck sort of way." (See all of Curt Holman's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
694 words, 02/22/12

MaryAnn Johanson, Flick Filosopher: POOR (cg)
"There's nothing smart or sophisticated here, just a lot of cheap cheesiness pretending to be elegant and chic." (See all of MaryAnn Johanson's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
715 words, 02/28/12

HIGHBROW PRESS (4 Reviews)

Manohla Dargis, New York Times: WEAK
"...strained, largely mirthless... would be perfectly acceptable watched on the back of an airline seat or at home while you're doing housework." (See all of Manohla Dargis's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
613 words, 02/17/12

Anthony Lane, New Yorker: POOR
"...unstinting in its duties toward the frighteningly obvious." (See all of Anthony Lane's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
1,052 words, 02/20/12

Ian Buckwalter, NPR: POOR
"All the performers seem more than game... But with the material they're given, they mostly just seem foolish for showing up to the movie to begin with." (See all of Ian Buckwalter's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
638 words, 02/16/12

Betsy Sharkey, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...a hit-and-miss affair... if you are in the mood for action, there is a whole lot of it here.... this is war after all, a bromance, not a romance, muscle, not mush."
(See all of Betsy Sharkey's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
695 words, 02/17/12

MOVIE INDUSTRY (5 Reviews)

Peter Debruge, Daily Variety: WEAK
"...predictably over-the-top... blithely coasts from suspension of disbelief into check-your-brain-at-the-door territory..." (See all of Peter Debruge's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
700 words, 02/09/12

Todd McCarthy, Hollywood Reporter: POOR
"...the whole picture should have been sent back for a reshoot.... an eye-roller from start to finish..." (See all of Todd McCarthy's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
796 words, 02/09/12

Betsy Sharkey, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...a hit-and-miss affair... if you are in the mood for action, there is a whole lot of it here.... this is war after all, a bromance, not a romance, muscle, not mush."
(See all of Betsy Sharkey's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
695 words, 02/17/12

Emanuel Levy, Cinema 24/7: MODERATE (cg)
"It is as if Witherspoon, Pine, Hardy, and the rest are crying out to the audience: 'Save us from this madness! Save us from McG!' " (See all of Emanuel Levy's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
695 words, 02/13/12

Manohla Dargis, New York Times: WEAK
"...strained, largely mirthless... would be perfectly acceptable watched on the back of an airline seat or at home while you're doing housework."
(See all of Manohla Dargis's reviews...) (Read the full review...)
613 words, 02/17/12
(cg) = based on the critic's grade

Review Mixture
22.5 Percentage Points Average Difference Between Reviews
(Norm is 18.4pp; <18.4pp = More Consistent; >18.4pp = More Mixed)
This Means War

This Means War's reviews are separated by an average 22.5 percentage points. The norm for this measure is 18.4 percentage points. Less than 18.4 indicates more consistent reviews; greater than 18.4 indicates more mixed reviews. In the chart below, each dot represents a review, with the dots at the top more positive than the dots at the bottom. From left to right, the dots represent reviews in big, bigger and biggest publications. Roll over each dot for more detail.

This Means War
(46 reviews)
Roll over dots for each review
Broad National   Alternative/Indie   Highbrow Press   Key Cities
NY, LA, Chicago, & Toronto Movie Industry  
Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Moderate
Weak
Poor
Reviews
Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Moderate
Weak
Poor
Reviews
Big
Publications
>Bigger
Publications
>Biggest
Publications
Coverage, Volume & Length
This Means War

Coverage: This Means War's reviews cover 91.5% of potential readers (average is 67.9%). Volume: The film's reviews total 25,430 words in volume (average is 20,172 words). Length: The film's reviews average 553 words in length (the norm is 517 words).

This Means War
Coverage, Volume & Length
(46 Reviews, reviews below)
TotalBroad
National
Press
Local
News-
papers
Alter–
native/
Indie
High-
Brow
Press
Movie
Industry
NY/LA
Chicago
Toronto
Key
Cities
Total
B.O.
Coverage:
Volume:
Length:
91.5%
25,430
553
100.0%
4,845
485
89.9%
10,928
546
100.0%
6,265
570
62.7%
2,998
750
83.3%
3,499
700
90.3%
5,656
471
93.4%
6,512
543
$54.8M
Averages: 67.9%
20,173
517
65.9%
3,288
467
80.6%
10,359
518
81.9%
3,543
447
58.9%
2,454
626
85.2%
3,376
673
84.5%
5,863
497
73.2%
2,801
533
Opening Day Reviews
Reviews Broke 37.8 Hours Before Release (Norm is 1.2 Release)
This Means War

This Means War's reviews on average broke 37.8 hours before opening. Norm for this measure is 1.2 hours before. The chart below shows reviews on opening day and the days before and after opening; the left side is earlier and the right side is later. The red bars extending above the horizontal mid-line represent more positive reviews, and the red bars extending below represent more negative reviews. The white space/red bar in the middle is This Means War's opening day. Click on any bar for a list of the reviews for that day.

This Means War
(46 reviews, click on bars for reviews)
M O R E    P O S I T I V E    R E V I E W S
E
A
R
L
I
E
R
L
A
T
E
R
M O R E    N E G A T I V E    R E V I E W S
Movie Review Intelligence Mobile Web App 1.2
Updated: Fri, Sep 7 2012, 03:34pm
Digg This StumbleUpon del.icio.us Twitter Share on Facebook
 | E-Mail to a Friend  | Print 


Mobile Web App version 1.2 shows a list of all current movies and review information. You can click through to the cast, director, synopsis, release date and rating on page two, plus individual reviews on page three. The information is updated on a live/real-time basis. You can also search our database of films. Designed for when you're on the move and want the latest info, this app will work on any mobile web browser.

From your mobile device -- only from a mobile device -- open our Mobile Web App here...


 

get one email
Update
every Friday when
the reviews are in
GO

Opening Soon
   (Early Figures)

Friday, May 10
Peeples 75.0% May 10
The Great Gatsby (2013) nr May 10
Aftershock (2013) nr May 10
Erased (2013) nr May 10
How Sweet It Is (2013) nr May 10
Java Heat nr May 10
No One Lives nr May 10
Sightseers 78.9% May 10
The Attack (L'attentat) 62.8% May 10
The Confession (2013) nr May 10
Venus and Serena 57.3% May 10
You Will Be My Son (Tu seras mon fils) 71.3% May 10
Friday, May 17
Star Trek Into Darkness 71.9% May 15
33 Postcards 33.0% May 17
Augustine 75.0% May 17
Black Rock nr May 17
Frances Ha 83.5% May 17
Pieta (2013) 70.3% May 17
Stories We Tell 82.1% May 17
The English Teacher 33.0% May 17
The Fruit Hunters 68.7% May 13
Friday, May 24
Fast & Furious 6 nr May 24
The Hangover Part III nr May 24
Epic (2013) nr May 24
Before Midnight (2013) 98.5% May 24
We Steal Secrets: The Story of Wikileaks 72.0% May 24
Beyond
Don Jon 55.6% Oct 18
Ain't Them Bodies Saints 86.3% Aug 16
Battle of the Year: The Dream Team nr Sep 13
Crystal Fairy 65.0% Jul 12
Fruitvale 89.3% Jul 26
I'm So Excited! 54.7% Jun 28
Lovelace 73.5% Aug 9
Prince Avalanche 77.9% Aug 16
The East 89.1% May 31
The Hunt (Jagten) 71.3% Jul 12
The Spectacular Now 82.2% Aug 2
The Way, Way Back 87.6% Jul 5