Giving moviegoers the most accurate picture of movie reviews possible
VAMPIRES SUCK Movie Reviews
Story: Comedy about an anxious non-vampire high school girl torn between two boys. Cast: Chris Riggi, Ken Jeong Director: Jason Friedberg Opened: August 18, 2010 On DVD: November 30, 2010 From: 20th Century Fox Rating: PG-13 Length: 1 hr. 22 min.
Out On DVD
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
Vampires Suck, Poor Reviews
Updated: Tue, Mar 27 2012, 11:28am
Digg This StumbleUpon del.icio.us Twitter Share on Facebook
 | E-Mail to a Friend  | Print 

Vampires Suck played to poor reviews. • Randy Cordova wrote in the Arizona Republic, "...aggressively dumb, which isn't such a sin. But it is mostly unfunny, and that's living death in a movie like this." • Steve Persall wrote in the St. Petersburg Times, "Desperation is obvious..." • And John Gholson wrote for Cinematical, "...almost bad enough to make me pity the 'Twilight' film series for being the subject of such limp, toothless mockery."  More Reviews Below...

Vampires Suck
Positive Reviews
(22 Reviews,  reviews below)
 Compare This Movie... 
TotalBroad
National
Press
Local
News-
papers
Alter–
native/
Indie
High-
Brow
Press
Movie
Industry
NY/LA
Chicago
Toronto
Key
Cities
Total
B.O.
30.3% 42.0% 30.1% 17.4% 32.8% 31.3% 32.2% 24.1% $36.7M
Averages: 51.8% 54.1% 52.3% 46.9% 45.8% 48.7% 49.9% 54.7%
Reviews & Quotes (22)

BROAD NATIONAL PRESS (1 Review)
Adam Markovitz, Entertainment Weekly: FAIR (cg)
" 'The Twilight Saga,' with its operatic gloom and straight-faced fantasy, is undoubtedly ripe for a smart, good-natured ribbing. This isn't it." (Read the full review...)
88 words, 08/20/10
we have an app for when you're out and about
get our iPhone app...     get our mobile web app...
movie     review     intelligence
NEW YORK/LOS ANGELES/CHICAGO/TORONTO (8 Reviews)
Jeannette Catsoulis, New York Times: POOR
"...pointless... Though it's useful to learn that even vampires can be repelled by flatulence -- maybe we should eat that garlic instead of draping it on our windows." (Read the full review...)
302 words, 08/19/10

Elizabeth Weitzman, New York Daily News: WEAK (cg)
"...doesn't suck, exactly, but the laziness and lack of imagination kinda bites." (Read the full review...)
127 words, 08/20/10

Michael Ordoña, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...the usual mixed bag of hits and misses, but with more hits than expected.... Even its slack pacing -- it often feels as if it's holding for laughs -- recalls its sources." (Read the full review...)
283 words, 08/20/10

Rafer Guzman, New York Newsday: POOR (cg)
"Why does 'Vampires Suck,' a spoof of the 'Twilight' franchise, feel undead on arrival? Probably because it has no heart." (Read the full review...)
315 words, 08/20/10

Bruce DeMara, Toronto Star: POOR (cg)
"...another drearily pointless parody, this time lampooning the 'Twilight' series of movies (actually just the first two, 'Twilight' and 'New Moon')." (Read the full review...)
326 words, 08/18/10

Nick Pinkerton, Village Voice/LA Weekly: POOR
"Many of the film's jokes, such as they are, consist of mentioning the titles of contemporary reality-TV shows, which should be a riot for viewers who think that their cable channel guide is the soul of wit." (Read the full review...)
214 words, 08/20/10

Andrew Dowler, Toronto Now: WEAK (cg)
"...a mediocre 'Twilight' parody whose most repeated gag involves somebody being hit on the head and/or falling down. Funny moments erupt now and then..." (Read the full review...)
196 words, 08/19/10
KEY CITIES (7 Reviews)
Jen Chaney, Washington Post: POOR (cg)
"Twi-hards will immediately get all the in-jokes... But they still probably won't laugh much.... a flick that wouldn't recognize funny if it came up and sank both of its fangs into its uninspired neck." (Read the full review...)
546 words, 08/19/10

Peter Hartlaub, Houston Chronicle/San Francisco Chronicle: POOR (cg)
"...looks like it cost less to make than the typical Bon Jovi video, mines gay stereotypes and manages not a single memorable joke at the expense of the easiest target in the world: Stephenie Meyer fans." (Read the full review...)
445 words, 08/20/10

Roger Moore, Orlando Sentinel: POOR (cg)
"...the sort of movie where 'finger food' is offered at a party. And it's fingers. Haw." (Read the full review...)
400 words, 08/20/10

Randy Cordova, Arizona Republic: POOR (cg)
"...aggressively dumb, which isn't such a sin. But it is mostly unfunny, and that's living death in a movie like this." (Read the full review...)
206 words, 08/20/10

Natalie Southwick, Boston Globe: POOR (cg)
"...provides enough recognizable references that Twi-hards with a sense of humor should feel included in the jokes, or inspired to make up their own. Non-'Twilight' fans would be better off surfing YouTube." (Read the full review...)
420 words, 08/20/10

Steve Persall, St. Petersburg Times: FAIR (cg)
"...the jokes run dry long before the fadeout, and the movie's only 80 minutes counting end credits. Desperation is obvious..." (Read the full review...)
468 words, 08/19/10
ALTERNATIVE/INDIE PRESS (7 Reviews)
Nick Pinkerton, Village Voice/LA Weekly: POOR
"Many of the film's jokes, such as they are, consist of mentioning the titles of contemporary reality-TV shows, which should be a riot for viewers who think that their cable channel guide is the soul of wit." (Read the full review...)
214 words, 08/20/10

Zak Jason, Boston Phoenix: POOR (cg)
"...less a parody and more a breezy compilation of vampire flicks that gets no life from its D-list comedians." (Read the full review...)
150 words, 08/27/10

Nathan Rabin, AV Club: POOR (cg)
"...merits commendation for such non-triumphs as telling a relatively coherent story, settling on one genre as a satirical target, and conveying a knowledge of its source material..." (Read the full review...)
368 words, 08/18/10

John Gholson, Cinematical: POOR
"...almost bad enough to make me pity the 'Twilight' film series for being the subject of such limp, toothless mockery." (Read the full review...)
626 words, 08/18/10

Simon Abrams, Slant: POOR (cg)
"...reeks as much as the vampire trend it's parodying.... a lot of the jokes aren't jokes at all, but rather, inexplicable predated pop culture references." (Read the full review...)
790 words, 08/18/10

Andrew Dowler, Toronto Now: WEAK (cg)
"...a mediocre 'Twilight' parody whose most repeated gag involves somebody being hit on the head and/or falling down. Funny moments erupt now and then..." (Read the full review...)
196 words, 08/19/10
HIGHBROW PRESS (2 Reviews)
Jeannette Catsoulis, New York Times: POOR
"...pointless... Though it's useful to learn that even vampires can be repelled by flatulence -- maybe we should eat that garlic instead of draping it on our windows." (Read the full review...)
302 words, 08/19/10

Michael Ordoña, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...the usual mixed bag of hits and misses, but with more hits than expected.... Even its slack pacing -- it often feels as if it's holding for laughs -- recalls its sources." (Read the full review...)
283 words, 08/20/10
MOVIE INDUSTRY (4 Reviews)
Joe Leydon, Daily Variety: POOR
"...an instantly forgettable trifle... fairly close to worthless. Brandishes obvious gags, uninventive slapstick and stale pop-culture allusions..." (Read the full review...)
578 words, 08/17/10

Frank Scheck, Hollywood Reporter: POOR
"If you think Jacob peeing on a tree or Becca farting in Edward's face when he attempts to climb into bed with her are the height of comic wit..." (Read the full review...)
395 words, 08/18/10

Michael Ordoña, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...the usual mixed bag of hits and misses, but with more hits than expected.... Even its slack pacing -- it often feels as if it's holding for laughs -- recalls its sources." (Read the full review...)
283 words, 08/20/10

Jeannette Catsoulis, New York Times: POOR
"...pointless... Though it's useful to learn that even vampires can be repelled by flatulence -- maybe we should eat that garlic instead of draping it on our windows." (Read the full review...)
302 words, 08/19/10
(cg) = based on the critic's grade

Review Mixture
12.7 Percentage Points Average Difference Between Reviews
(Norm is 18.4pp; <18.4pp = More Consistent; >18.4pp = More Mixed)

Vampires Suck's reviews are separated by an average 12.7 percentage points. The norm for this measure is 18.4 percentage points. Less than 18.4 indicates more consistent reviews; greater than 18.4 indicates more mixed reviews. In the chart below, each dot represents a review, with the dots at the top more positive than the dots at the bottom. From left to right, the dots represent reviews in big, bigger and biggest publications. Roll over each dot for more detail.

Vampires Suck
(22 reviews)
Roll over dots for each review
Broad National   Alternative/Indie   Highbrow Press   Key Cities
NY, LA, Chicago, & Toronto Movie Industry  
Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Moderate
Weak
Poor
Reviews
Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Moderate
Weak
Poor
Reviews
Big
Publications
>Bigger
Publications
>Biggest
Publications
Coverage, Volume & Length

Coverage: Vampires Suck's reviews cover 25.0% of potential readers (average is 68.2%). Volume: The film's reviews total 7,894 words in volume (average is 19,979 words). Length: The film's reviews average 359 words in length (the norm is 512 words).

Vampires Suck
Coverage, Volume & Length
(22 Reviews,  reviews below)
TotalBroad
National
Press
Local
News-
papers
Alter–
native/
Indie
High-
Brow
Press
Movie
Industry
NY/LA
Chicago
Toronto
Key
Cities
Total
B.O.
Coverage:
Volume:
Length:
25.0%
7,894
359
10.7%
88
88
55.3%
4,283
357
76.0%
2,550
364
29.7%
585
293
66.7%
1,558
390
60.9%
1,969
246
49.3%
2,930
419
$36.7M
Averages: 68.2%
19,979
512
66.7%
3,178
451
80.2%
10,677
521
80.8%
3,310
430
58.7%
2,374
630
85.2%
3,407
685
83.7%
5,861
500
73.0%
2,885
539
Opening Day Reviews
Reviews Broke 39.7 Hours After Release (Norm is 0.2 Release)

Vampires Suck's reviews on average broke 39.7 hours after opening. Norm for this measure is 0.2 hours after. The chart below shows reviews on opening day and the days before and after opening; the left side is earlier and the right side is later. The red bars extending above the horizontal mid-line represent more positive reviews, and the red bars extending below represent more negative reviews. The white space/red bar in the middle is Vampires Suck's opening day. Click on any bar for a list of the reviews for that day.

Vampires Suck
(22 reviews, click on bars for reviews)
M O R E    P O S I T I V E    R E V I E W S
E
A
R
L
I
E
R
L
A
T
E
R
M O R E    N E G A T I V E    R E V I E W S
Movie Review Intelligence Mobile Web App 1.0
Updated: Tue, Mar 27 2012, 11:28am
Digg This StumbleUpon del.icio.us Twitter Share on Facebook
 | E-Mail to a Friend  | Print 


Mobile Web App version 1.0 shows a list of all current movies and review information. You can click through to the cast, director, synopsis, release date and rating on page two, plus individual reviews on page three. The information is updated on a live/real-time basis. You can also search our database of films. Designed for when you're on the move and want the latest info, this app will work on any mobile web browser.

From your mobile device -- only from a mobile device -- open our Mobile Web App here...





A


 

 

 

get one email
Update
every Friday when
the reviews are in
GO
Ongoing Wide
  Releases
(Limiteds Below)
Ongoing Limited
  Releases
(Wides Above)