VAMPIRES SUCK Movie Reviews

Movie review iPhone app at the bottom of this page... 

Story: Comedy about an anxious non-vampire high school girl torn between two boys. Cast: Chris Riggi, Ken Jeong Director: Jason Friedberg Opened: August 18, 2010 On DVD: November 30, 2010 From: 20th Century Fox Rating: PG-13 Length: 1 hr. 22 min.
Out On DVD
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
Vampires Suck, Poor Reviews
Updated: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 07:10pm
Digg This StumbleUpon del.icio.us Twitter Subscribe to Our RSS Share on Facebook
 | E-Mail to a Friend  | Print 

Vampires Suck played to poor reviews. • Randy Cordova wrote in the Arizona Republic, "...aggressively dumb, which isn't such a sin. But it is mostly unfunny, and that's living death in a movie like this." • Steve Persall wrote in the St. Petersburg Times, "Desperation is obvious..." • And John Gholson wrote for Cinematical, "...almost bad enough to make me pity the 'Twilight' film series for being the subject of such limp, toothless mockery."  More Reviews Below...

Vampires Suck
Positive Reviews
(22 Reviews, click on headers for reviews)
 Compare This Movie... 
TotalBroad
National
Press
Local
News-
papers
Alter–
native/
Indie
High-
Brow
Press
Movie
Industry
NY/LA
Chicago
Toronto
Key
Cities
Total
B.O.
30.3% 42.0% 30.1% 17.4% 32.8% 31.3% 32.2% 24.1% $36.7M
Averages: 51.7% 54.1% 52.3% 46.8% 45.5% 48.6% 49.8% 54.6%
Reviews & Quotes (22)

BROAD NATIONAL PRESS (1 Review)
Adam Markovitz, Entertainment Weekly: FAIR (cg)
" 'The Twilight Saga,' with its operatic gloom and straight-faced fantasy, is undoubtedly ripe for a smart, good-natured ribbing. This isn't it." (Read the full review...)
88 words, 08/20/10
NEW YORK/LOS ANGELES/CHICAGO/TORONTO (8 Reviews)
Jeannette Catsoulis, New York Times: POOR
"...pointless parody..." (Read the full review...)
302 words, 08/19/10

Elizabeth Weitzman, New York Daily News: WEAK (cg)
"...doesn't suck, exactly, but the laziness and lack of imagination kinda bites." (Read the full review...)
127 words, 08/20/10

Michael Ordoña, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...the usual mixed bag of hits and misses, but with more hits than expected.... enjoyable details and on-the-mark senseless brutality. Even its slack pacing -- it often feels as if it's holding for laughs -- recalls its sources." (Read the full review...)
283 words, 08/20/10

Rafer Guzman, New York Newsday: POOR (cg)
"Why does 'Vampires Suck,' a spoof of the 'Twilight' franchise, feel undead on arrival? Probably because it has no heart." (Read the full review...)
315 words, 08/20/10

Bruce DeMara, Toronto Star: POOR (cg)
"Parodies can be hilarious. This one sucks." (Read the full review...)
326 words, 08/18/10

Nick Pinkerton, Village Voice/LA Weekly: POOR
"Many of the film's jokes, such as they are, consist of mentioning the titles of contemporary reality-TV shows, which should be a riot for viewers who think that their cable channel guide is the soul of wit." (Read the full review...)
214 words, 08/20/10

Andrew Dowler, Toronto Now: WEAK (cg)
"...a mediocre 'Twilight' parody whose most repeated gag involves somebody being hit on the head and/or falling down. Funny moments erupt now and then..." (Read the full review...)
196 words, 08/19/10
KEY CITIES (7 Reviews)
Jen Chaney, Washington Post: POOR (cg)
"...a painfully unfunny 'Twilight' spoof..." (Read the full review...)
546 words, 08/19/10

Peter Hartlaub, Houston Chronicle/San Francisco Chronicle: POOR (cg)
"...looks like it cost less to make than the typical Bon Jovi video, mines gay stereotypes and manages not a single memorable joke at the expense of the easiest target in the world: Stephenie Meyer fans." (Read the full review...)
445 words, 08/20/10

Roger Moore, Orlando Sentinel: POOR (cg)
"...the sort of movie where 'finger food' is offered at a party. And it's fingers. Haw." (Read the full review...)
400 words, 08/20/10

Randy Cordova, Arizona Republic: POOR (cg)
"...aggressively dumb, which isn't such a sin. But it is mostly unfunny, and that's living death in a movie like this." (Read the full review...)
206 words, 08/20/10

Natalie Southwick, Boston Globe: POOR (cg)
"...provides enough recognizable references that Twi-hards with a sense of humor should feel included in the jokes, or inspired to make up their own. Non-'Twilight' fans would be better off surfing YouTube." (Read the full review...)
420 words, 08/20/10

Steve Persall, St. Petersburg Times: FAIR (cg)
"...the jokes run dry long before the fadeout, and the movie's only 80 minutes counting end credits. Desperation is obvious..." (Read the full review...)
468 words, 08/19/10
ALTERNATIVE/INDIE PRESS (7 Reviews)
Nick Pinkerton, Village Voice/LA Weekly: POOR
"Many of the film's jokes, such as they are, consist of mentioning the titles of contemporary reality-TV shows, which should be a riot for viewers who think that their cable channel guide is the soul of wit." (Read the full review...)
214 words, 08/20/10

Zak Jason, Boston Phoenix: POOR (cg)
" 'Vampires Suck.' And so does this movie." (Read the full review...)
150 words, 08/27/10

Nathan Rabin, AV Club: POOR (cg)
"...merits commendation for such non-triumphs as telling a relatively coherent story, settling on one genre as a satirical target, and conveying a knowledge of its source material..." (Read the full review...)
368 words, 08/18/10

John Gholson, Cinematical: POOR
"...almost bad enough to make me pity the 'Twilight' film series for being the subject of such limp, toothless mockery." (Read the full review...)
626 words, 08/18/10

Simon Abrams, Slant: POOR (cg)
"...reeks as much as the vampire trend it's parodying. A characteristic work of monumentally lazy spoof comedy by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer... a lot of the jokes aren't jokes at all, but rather, inexplicable predated pop culture references." (Read the full review...)
790 words, 08/18/10

Andrew Dowler, Toronto Now: WEAK (cg)
"...a mediocre 'Twilight' parody whose most repeated gag involves somebody being hit on the head and/or falling down. Funny moments erupt now and then..." (Read the full review...)
196 words, 08/19/10
HIGHBROW PRESS (2 Reviews)
Jeannette Catsoulis, New York Times: POOR
"...pointless parody..." (Read the full review...)
302 words, 08/19/10

Michael Ordoña, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...the usual mixed bag of hits and misses, but with more hits than expected.... enjoyable details and on-the-mark senseless brutality. Even its slack pacing -- it often feels as if it's holding for laughs -- recalls its sources." (Read the full review...)
283 words, 08/20/10
MOVIE INDUSTRY (4 Reviews)
Joe Leydon, Daily Variety: POOR
"...this instantly forgettable trifle is fairly close to worthless. Brandishing obvious gags, uninventive slapstick and stale pop-culture allusions, the filmmakers only occasionally hit the bull's-eye while aiming at assorted easy targets provided by the teen angst and supernatural bloodletting of the ongoing 'Twilight' franchise." (Read the full review...)
578 words, 08/17/10

Frank Scheck, Hollywood Reporter: POOR
"If you think Jacob peeing on a tree or Becca farting in Edward's face when he attempts to climb into bed with her are the height of comic wit..." (Read the full review...)
395 words, 08/18/10

Michael Ordoña, Los Angeles Times: MODERATE
"...the usual mixed bag of hits and misses, but with more hits than expected.... enjoyable details and on-the-mark senseless brutality. Even its slack pacing -- it often feels as if it's holding for laughs -- recalls its sources." (Read the full review...)
283 words, 08/20/10

Jeannette Catsoulis, New York Times: POOR
"...pointless parody..." (Read the full review...)
302 words, 08/19/10
(cg) = based on the critic's grade

Review Mixture
12.7 Percentage Points Average Difference Between Reviews
(Norm is 18.4pp; <18.4pp = More Consistent; >18.4pp = More Mixed)

Vampires Suck's reviews are separated by an average 12.7 percentage points. The norm for this measure is 18.4 percentage points. Less than 18.4 indicates more consistent reviews; greater than 18.4 indicates more mixed reviews. In the chart below, each dot represents a review, with the dots at the top more positive than the dots at the bottom. From left to right, the dots represent reviews in big, bigger and biggest publications. Roll over each dot for more detail.

Vampires Suck
(22 reviews, roll over dots for each review)
Broad National   Alternative/Indie   Highbrow Press   Key Cities
NY, LA, Chicago, & Toronto Movie Industry  
Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Moderate
Weak
Poor
Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Moderate
Weak
Poor
Big
Publications
>Bigger
Publications
>Biggest
Publications
Coverage, Volume & Length

Coverage: Vampires Suck's reviews cover 25.0% of potential readers (average is 67.5%). Volume: The film's reviews total 7,894 words in volume (average is 19,795 words). Length: The film's reviews average 359 words in length (the norm is 510 words).

Vampires Suck
Coverage, Volume & Length
(22 Reviews, click on headers for reviews)
TotalBroad
National
Press
Local
News-
papers
Alter–
native/
Indie
High-
Brow
Press
Movie
Industry
NY/LA
Chicago
Toronto
Key
Cities
Total
B.O.
Coverage:
Volume:
Length:
25.0%
7,894
359
10.7%
88
88
55.3%
4,283
357
76.0%
2,550
364
29.7%
585
293
66.7%
1,558
390
60.9%
1,969
246
49.3%
2,930
419
$36.7M
Averages: 67.5%
19,795
510
65.8%
3,082
444
80.0%
10,774
521
80.0%
3,150
422
58.6%
2,384
630
85.9%
3,434
688
83.9%
5,858
500
72.4%
2,908
540
Opening Day Reviews
Reviews Broke 39.7 Hours After Release (Norm is 0.1 Release)

Vampires Suck's reviews on average broke 39.7 hours after opening. Norm for this measure is 0.1 hours after. The chart below shows reviews on opening day and the days before and after opening; the left side is earlier and the right side is later. The red bars extending above the horizontal mid-line represent more positive reviews, and the red bars extending below represent more negative reviews. The white space/red bar in the middle is Vampires Suck's opening day. Click on any bar for a list of the reviews for that day.

Vampires Suck
(22 reviews, click on bars for reviews)
M O R E    P O S I T I V E    R E V I E W S
E
A
R
L
I
E
R
L
A
T
E
R
M O R E    N E G A T I V E    R E V I E W S
Movie Review Intelligence iPhone App, Version 1.3
Updated: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 07:10pm
Digg This StumbleUpon del.icio.us Twitter Subscribe to Our RSS Share on Facebook
 | E-Mail to a Friend  | Print 


iPhone app version 1.3 shows a list of all current movies and review information. You can click through to the cast, director, synopsis, release date and rating on page two, plus individual reviews on page three. The information is updated on a live/real-time basis. In version 1.3 we added movie run time, distribution and box-office. Designed for when you're on the move and want the latest info. The cost is 99 cents. For more information, visit our page at the iTunes app store here...





















get one email
Update
every Friday when
the reviews are in
GO
Ongoing Wide
  Releases
(Limiteds Below)
Ongoing Limited
  Releases
(Wides Above)